In general, we're at the point where still image quality with ample lighting is more than acceptable even on phones that only cost 200, but the relatively small sensors and less advanced ISPs on mid-range phones tend to produce poor images in ouverture casino vinon low light and.
Still Image Testing, this first daytime test involves a scene with variant lighting conditions, which can cause some smartphones to overexpose their photos.
The one thing I would note is that the G4 Plus does a better job of maintaining detail in pasino le havre poker the grassy patch.You can see details on the right side of the frame and in the distance that are obscured on the normal Moto G4 due to its dark exposure.In this scene the Moto G4 and G4 Plus perform similarly.In addition to being 16MP compared to 13MP on the G4, the increased sensor size means that those pixels are also larger,.3m compared.12m.As for the Moto G4 Plus, there is an improvement over the normal Moto G4 but not to the same degree as the previous image as both phones manage a similar exposure in the scene.Fo, bienvenue dans notre article solution du jeu 94 concernant la photo d'une femme sur une moto!My original assumption about the Moto G4 was that the G4 Plus simply shipped with a higher resolution sensor of the same size.Snapdragon 617 provides a better featured ISP, but in the end it's still down to the quality of the sensor and the image processing algorithms to produce a good shot.Looking back to the 2015 Moto G, it's hard to say whether the Moto G4 actually improves in its image quality.One would think that the Moto G4 Plus simply uses a higher resolution sensor in the same line as the sensor used in the Moto G4, but the story is actually more complicated than that.If you decided to do video recording at night the circumstances may change due the G4 Plus's larger sensor, but I don't think either phone is going to produce any sort of usable video at night.
Much like the first scene, the exposure of the two shots is different.
This is a very interesting situation, because in all likelihood it means that the Moto G4 Plus will be much better at low light photography than the less expensive model, and that's not what I expected from a 50 price bump.
In any case, both images are similar as far as detail, noise, and sharpness are concerned.0 -, jEU.info sarl., la plus grande collection de jeux gratuits en ligne.The Moto G4's video quality is acceptable for a mid-range device, but there's nothing exceptional about.In this case, the Moto G4 doesn't have the distracting color noise that made the 2015 Moto G basically unusable for low-light photos, but the tradeoff is that the photo is quite blurry and devoid of detail due to heavy noise reduction.I've opted to do my test with the Moto G4 Plus, but in general there's not really any difference between the two.The Moto G4 does outperform the Huawei Honor 5X, which has been my general recommendation at this price point.
The mixture of dark areas and highlights makes it a more difficult scene to get a good exposure than the previous one.